Categories
- Marketing Integration
- migration
- Online Marketing
- Online Merchandising
- Search Engine Marketing
- SEO
- Site Search
- Testing and Targeting
- Web 2.0
- Web analytics
Authors
- Adam Greco (47)
- Brent Dykes
- Ben Gaines (16)
- Brig Graff
- Brian Hawkins (4)
- Brent Hieggelke (6)
- Bill Mungovan (12)
- Chad Greenleaf
- Chris Knoch (4)
- Christopher Parkin (12)
- Christian Ridge (2)
- Chris Zaharias (5)
- David Kirschner
- John Broady (7)
- Jordan LeBaron (5)
- Jim McTiernan (2)
- Jeff Minich (2)
- Kiran Kairab Ferrandino
- Kevin Lindsay
- Matt Belkin (35)
- Mikel Chertudi (12)
- Michael Klein (4)
- Matt Langie (4)
- Pearce Aurigemma (2)
- Steve Gustavson (2)
- Wes Funk (3)
Pages
Recent posts
- Blending Art & Science: Quality of Search Testing
- Build Your ‘Bremando’ Army: Real-Time Creative Services
- SiteCatalyst de-duplication and American football
- Omniture Launches Partner Enablement API and Developer Sandbox
- Measuring “logged in” visitors without cookies
- When a Static Page Beats a Flash-based Page
- Excellent Blog Post - Getting More from your Omniture Implementation.
- Unified Sources - The DB VISTA solution that makes other VISTA solutions cower in fear
- Managing implementation on multiple sites
- Bing: A Welcome Addition to the Search World
Recent comments
- Steve Gustavson: Evan, A …
- Evan LaPointe: Steve, I a…
- Steve Gustavson: Hi Evan, th…
- Evan LaPointe: Steve, Bol…
- Cory: Saw the Omniture Socia…
- Nate Orshan: Ben, nice analo…
- Reuben Poon: Great post remi…
- marshall: I setup a kwid ide…
- Abhilash: Hi Ben, Thanks for…
- Ben Gaines: Ben: Great point…
Links
- DigitalAlex
- eMetrics (Jim Sterne)
- Forrester Research (John Lovett)
- Future Now’s grokdotcom
- immeria
- Judah Phillips Weblog
- June Dershewitz on Web Analytics
- Lies, Damned Lies
- LunaMetrics
- Mine That Data
- Occam’s Razor
- Rich Page Ramblings
- SemAngel
- The Analytics Guru
- Web Analysis, Behavioral Targeting and Advertising
- Web Analytics World
Archives
Utilizing Predictive Revenue Models in Paid & Organic Search
One of the more interesting concepts presented at last week’s SES show in San Jose detailed the use of predictive revenue modeling for SEO and paid search. A former colleague of mine, Dave Roth of Yahoo!, runs search programs on behalf of Yahoo!’s properties. He discussed their use of predictive data models to gauge how they were performing against their competition.
In SEO it works like this:
For each keyword, create an “Opportunity report” that looks at your current organic rank and click volume versus your top competitors, and measure the gaps. Then map those gaps to Lifetime Value (LTV) to quantify their value. If, for example, you know how much revenue you made in position #1 versus position #2, you can quantify your revenue losses or gains based on rank. In other words, how much revenue are you losing by not ranking higher than your competitors? Nothing gets an executive’s attention faster than lost revenue, especially if you can see (at least roughly) how much revenue your competitors are earning by outranking you.
In paid search it works similarly, but is a little more complex:
For each keyword, create an LTV model based on past revenue performance, click volume, rank, CPC and click costs. By factoring in click costs you are capturing your efficiency over time because click costs account for your quality score. At Yahoo! Dave explained that they reforecast every month to stay on top of rapidly changing search markets, then communicate the updated numbers across all relevant internal departments so everybody knows what revenue gains or losses to expect for that month. At Yahoo! they use a “scorecard” to measure each Yahoo! property vs. another, all based on ROI (both immediate for that month and LTV). My favorite line in Dave’s presentation was a Yahoo! mantra: “If you can’t quantify it, it doesn’t exist.”
In a world where everything is quantified, all of your actions can be based on data and revenue models; and perhaps even more importantly, you can communicate potential fluctuations in revenue BEFORE they happen.
Make sure your toolset can read your search performance data across both paid and organic so you don’t have to marry two different reports together. Having that data in two separate systems leaves room for human error when combining the data sets. Don’t settle for anything less than a holistic approach to analyzing the performance of your search programs, and don’t rule out the importance of predictive revenue models for your organization.
Hello Bill,
I have always done this when i pitch to my clients. I call this the “Lost Opportunity Report”. But then when the revenue losses or gains is dependant on rank, then there acceptance seems to be positive, else it has been on the negative…
Nice article…
Palani