Authors
- Adam Greco (16)
- Brian Hawkins (1)
- Brent Hieggelke (6)
- Bill Mungovan (6)
- Christopher Parkin (10)
- Christian Ridge (1)
- Chris Zaharias (3)
- John Broady (5)
- Jordan LeBaron (3)
- Jim McTiernan (2)
- Lily Chiu (10)
- Matt Belkin (35)
- Mikel Chertudi (12)
- Matt Langie (1)
- Wes Funk (2)
Categories
- Marketing Integration
- migration
- Online Marketing
- Search Engine Marketing
- SEO
- Site Search
- Testing and Targeting
- Web 2.0
- Web analytics
Pages
Recent posts
- The Tale SEM Queries Tell
- Highlights from Pubcon: People are Testing, They’re Really Testing!
- Products Variable [Inside Omniture SiteCatalyst]
- Testing Cart Abandonment
- Segment Builder Best Practices [Inside Omniture SiteCatalyst]
- ASI (Advanced Segment Insight) [Inside Omniture SiteCatalyst]
- Interview About Site Search Analytics w/ Hurol Inan
- Election 2008: Who’s Working on Relevancy and Engagement?
- Acting on Your Site Search Analytics
- Omniture DataWarehouse [Inside Omniture SiteCatalyst]
Recent comments
- Doug: This is great example …
- Kate O': I thought your pres…
- Hussey: It is the common pro…
- Morris O'Donagan: We at http…
- Raquel Hirsch: Here is how O…
- GA: Hi, I have created on…
- Holly: All Voters need to re…
- Dan Cross: Nicely put togeth…
- Adam Greco: Tim - Glad to he…
- Adam Greco: Tim - I agree an…
Links
- Coffee, Sun & Technology
- Commerce 360
- Conversion Rater
- DigitalAlex
- eMetrics (Jim Sterne)
- Future Now’s grokdotcom
- immeria
- Judah Phillips Weblog
- June Dershewitz on Web Analytics
- Jupiter Research (John Lovett)
- Lies, Damned Lies
- LunaMetrics
- Mine That Data
- Occam’s Razor
- Rich Page Ramblings
- SemAngel
- The Analytics Guru
- Web Analysis, Behavioral Targeting and Advertising
- Web Analytics World
Archives
Utilizing Predictive Revenue Models in Paid & Organic Search
One of the more interesting concepts presented at last week’s SES show in San Jose detailed the use of predictive revenue modeling for SEO and paid search. A former colleague of mine, Dave Roth of Yahoo!, runs search programs on behalf of Yahoo!’s properties. He discussed their use of predictive data models to gauge how they were performing against their competition.
In SEO it works like this:
For each keyword, create an “Opportunity report” that looks at your current organic rank and click volume versus your top competitors, and measure the gaps. Then map those gaps to Lifetime Value (LTV) to quantify their value. If, for example, you know how much revenue you made in position #1 versus position #2, you can quantify your revenue losses or gains based on rank. In other words, how much revenue are you losing by not ranking higher than your competitors? Nothing gets an executive’s attention faster than lost revenue, especially if you can see (at least roughly) how much revenue your competitors are earning by outranking you.
In paid search it works similarly, but is a little more complex:
For each keyword, create an LTV model based on past revenue performance, click volume, rank, CPC and click costs. By factoring in click costs you are capturing your efficiency over time because click costs account for your quality score. At Yahoo! Dave explained that they reforecast every month to stay on top of rapidly changing search markets, then communicate the updated numbers across all relevant internal departments so everybody knows what revenue gains or losses to expect for that month. At Yahoo! they use a “scorecard” to measure each Yahoo! property vs. another, all based on ROI (both immediate for that month and LTV). My favorite line in Dave’s presentation was a Yahoo! mantra: “If you can’t quantify it, it doesn’t exist.”
In a world where everything is quantified, all of your actions can be based on data and revenue models; and perhaps even more importantly, you can communicate potential fluctuations in revenue BEFORE they happen.
Make sure your toolset can read your search performance data across both paid and organic so you don’t have to marry two different reports together. Having that data in two separate systems leaves room for human error when combining the data sets. Don’t settle for anything less than a holistic approach to analyzing the performance of your search programs, and don’t rule out the importance of predictive revenue models for your organization.
Hello Bill,
I have always done this when i pitch to my clients. I call this the “Lost Opportunity Report”. But then when the revenue losses or gains is dependant on rank, then there acceptance seems to be positive, else it has been on the negative…
Nice article…
Palani