Categories
- Channel Analytics
- Inside Discover
- Marketing Integration
- Migration
- Omniture Business
- Online Marketing
- Online Merchandising
- Search Engine Marketing
- SEO
- Site Search
- Social Media
- Testing and Targeting
- Web 2.0
- Web Analytics
Authors
- Aseem Chandra (3)
- Adam Egbert (7)
- Adam Greco (46)
- Alex Hill
- Adam Justis (2)
- Andrew Anderson (12)
- Brent Dykes (36)
- Nate Smith
- Ben Gaines (52)
- Brig Graff (5)
- Bret Gundersen (4)
- Brandon Hartness (2)
- Brian Hawkins (4)
- Brent Hieggelke (6)
- Bill Mungovan (16)
- Brandon Pulsipher (1)
- Ben Robison (8)
- Brent Watson (7)
- Cameron Cowan (4)
- Chad Greenleaf (3)
- Chad Warren (3)
- Chris Haleua
- Chris Knoch (4)
- Christopher Parkin (18)
- Christian Ridge (2)
- Customer Success (26)
- Chris Zaharias (6)
- Dave Dickson (1)
- David Humpherys (2)
- David Kirschner (5)
- Ed Hewett (19)
- Eric Hansen
- Harrison Jenkins
- Jacob Favre
- Jeremy Anderson (1)
- John Bates
- John Broady (10)
- Josh James
- Josh Kelson
- Jordan LeBaron (5)
- Jared Lees
- Jim McTiernan (2)
- Jeff Minich (9)
- Jose Santa Ana (2)
- Justin Grover (6)
- Kiran Kairab Ferrandino (8)
- Kevin Lindsay (5)
- Karl Moats
- Kevin Willeitner (4)
- Laura MacTaggart (5)
- Matt Freestone (1)
- Matt Belkin (35)
- Mikel Chertudi (12)
- Melinda Kersey
- Michael Halbrook (10)
- Michael Klein (4)
- Matt Langie (6)
- Marianne Llewellyn (2)
- Meme Rasmussen (1)
- Neil Morgan (6)
- Natalie Lacuesta Byrum (1)
- Pearce Aurigemma (31)
- Raj Sen
- Ray Pun (9)
- Richard Carey
- Roger Woods (2)
- Rhett Norton (5)
- Rich Page (1)
- Siddharth Chaudhary (2)
- Sean Gubler
- Steve Gustavson (3)
- Sid Shah (1)
- Sid Shaw
- Steve Smith
- Steve Hammond
- Tamara Gaffney (3)
- Tim Lott
- Tim Waddell (6)
- Wes Funk (4)
Pages
Recent posts
- Facebook’s IPO: The $100 Billion Question for Marketers
- Testing 303 - Advanced Optimization Paradigms - Part 2
- Tech Marketing Insights - EP5
- Standard Testing Methodology — Step 1:Question Creation
- Standard Testing Methodology — Intro
- Recovering Reservations from Visitors Who Abandon the Hotel Reservation Process
- Testing 303 - Advanced Optimization Paradigms - Part 1
- Testing 202 – 5 disciplines to get greater value from your testing program
- Testing 101 - 5 disciplines to grow your testing program
- Understanding the business value of social media
Recent comments
- Rudy Chou: Awesome article A…
- Tefal Alışveriş: My broth…
- germany travel: Lots of webs…
- rock filter test: I would li…
- James Leitess: when i run a …
- Joseph Brown: I definitely d…
- James: Is the 30 minutes vis…
- Jeferson: I love site, very …
- SEO Expert: Most Seo expert …
- SEO Expert: For myself, I wo…
Links
- DigitalAlex
- eMetrics (Jim Sterne)
- Forrester Research (John Lovett)
- Future Now’s grokdotcom
- immeria
- June Dershewitz on Web Analytics
- Lies, Damned Lies
- LunaMetrics
- Mine That Data
- Occam’s Razor
- Rich Page Ramblings
- SemAngel
- The Analytics Guru
- The Omni Man
- Web Analysis, Behavioral Targeting and Advertising
- Web Analytics World
Archives
Utilizing Predictive Revenue Models in Paid & Organic Search
One of the more interesting concepts presented at last week’s SES show in San Jose detailed the use of predictive revenue modeling for SEO and paid search. A former colleague of mine, Dave Roth of Yahoo!, runs search programs on behalf of Yahoo!’s properties. He discussed their use of predictive data models to gauge how they were performing against their competition.
In SEO it works like this:
For each keyword, create an “Opportunity report” that looks at your current organic rank and click volume versus your top competitors, and measure the gaps. Then map those gaps to Lifetime Value (LTV) to quantify their value. If, for example, you know how much revenue you made in position #1 versus position #2, you can quantify your revenue losses or gains based on rank. In other words, how much revenue are you losing by not ranking higher than your competitors? Nothing gets an executive’s attention faster than lost revenue, especially if you can see (at least roughly) how much revenue your competitors are earning by outranking you.
In paid search it works similarly, but is a little more complex:
For each keyword, create an LTV model based on past revenue performance, click volume, rank, CPC and click costs. By factoring in click costs you are capturing your efficiency over time because click costs account for your quality score. At Yahoo! Dave explained that they reforecast every month to stay on top of rapidly changing search markets, then communicate the updated numbers across all relevant internal departments so everybody knows what revenue gains or losses to expect for that month. At Yahoo! they use a “scorecard” to measure each Yahoo! property vs. another, all based on ROI (both immediate for that month and LTV). My favorite line in Dave’s presentation was a Yahoo! mantra: “If you can’t quantify it, it doesn’t exist.”
In a world where everything is quantified, all of your actions can be based on data and revenue models; and perhaps even more importantly, you can communicate potential fluctuations in revenue BEFORE they happen.
Make sure your toolset can read your search performance data across both paid and organic so you don’t have to marry two different reports together. Having that data in two separate systems leaves room for human error when combining the data sets. Don’t settle for anything less than a holistic approach to analyzing the performance of your search programs, and don’t rule out the importance of predictive revenue models for your organization.

Hello Bill,
I have always done this when i pitch to my clients. I call this the “Lost Opportunity Report”. But then when the revenue losses or gains is dependant on rank, then there acceptance seems to be positive, else it has been on the negative…
Nice article…
Palani